Article
Time To Buckle Up That Child
Eighteen years ago, I was privileged to travel to Cape Town, South Africa. It wasn’t my first trip, but my second, having earlier visited Pretoria. Both trips were sponsored—in Naija parlance, we call it awoof (gift). The trip to Cape Town, South Africa, was an eye-opener regarding concrete and enduring interventions to protect lives, especially those of children.
The trip to Cape Town was for a training program that included a tour of some neighborhoods to assess the effectiveness of specific interventions. During one such tour, I witnessed volunteers providing traffic-calming measures to protect black kids in a black neighborhood in Gordon’s Bay. These volunteers took a stand to protect the group we all call the leaders of tomorrow, rather than sitting on the fence.
Back home, the reverse is the case. We often leave everything to God instead of taking a stand to protect children, whose birth we gladly celebrate with much fanfare. As a parent or guardian, are you aware of the provisions of Section 58(4) of the National Road Traffic Regulations, 2004, which mandate that all occupants of a vehicle use a seatbelt for their safety? Do you know that this provision also covers children?
Whenever I focus on the dangerous trend of transporting children incorrectly, I reflect on what obtains in developed countries, where a newborn child must be transported in an appropriate car seat from the first day. I rhetorically ask readers who are parents or guardians: given the increasing number of unsafe practices by parents and guardians, especially women or mothers, which is ironic and strange to me.
Daily, I see mothers, especially during school runs, carrying children under twelve years in the front passenger seat, and sometimes two children of that age are seated in the front. To further complicate this risky driving behavior, the mother also uses her phone, which distracts and impairs her.
Whenever I stress these questions, I merely seek to challenge your consciousness regarding the dangers we expose our children to, despite our claim that we love and cherish them so much. Most of us who have heeded the Federal Road Safety Corps’ call to use seatbelts, unfortunately, do not see the sense in protecting our children while driving by strapping them in. Some lap them, while others leave them unattended in moving vehicles. Some claim that strapping children in a car seat is an alien practice.
This group maintains that strapping children in a car is meant for the white man, not the black man. Others say it is meant for the wealthy, while for some, it is a status symbol habit for those striving to flaunt their class. For others, the cost of a car seat is high, even though the cheapest cars they drive cost at least five million naira, and other cars go for as high as sixty or hundreds of millions of naira, compared to car seats whose cost can’t even buy the tires for these cars.
Even if car seats were as expensive as tires, would that be too much for the protection of the life of God’s precious gift? Yet, these same parents would not mind spending thousands on drinks, pepper soup, and other extras with friends and business partners. The female ones would prefer spending thousands or millions of naira on designer shoes and bags but not on the safety of their children.
These self-centered choices that parents make are, to me, absurd, to say the least. I believe that child safety should remain the passion of every parent, including would-be parents. It has been over fifteen years since the Federal Road Safety Corps introduced the seatbelt driving culture novelty. Yet, a greater percentage of parents and guardians don’t care about child safety.
Daily, these children, whether in school buses or family vehicles, are transported without any regard for their safety. Over the years, child passenger safety campaign themes, such as “Don’t kill the Child, Kill the Bad habit,” have been developed to raise safety awareness about children’s safety. This is because road safety crises are the leading cause of preventable death, the third-largest cause of disabilities, and the second-largest cause of death after AIDS/HIV in Africa.
A study has shown that 10% of global road deaths occurred in Africa, although only 4% of the world’s registered vehicles are on the continent. This study posits that if reporting of road crashes were to improve, the road crash index on the continent would likely show more deaths. According to this study, South Africa and Nigeria account for most of the reported deaths.
These deaths, according to the study, are caused mostly by human error and vehicle factors, including overspeeding, dangerous overtaking, alcohol and drug abuse, negligence of drivers, poor driving standards, and overloaded people or goods vehicles. Other factors include poor tire maintenance, burst tires, bad roads and hilly terrain, negligence of pedestrians, distraction of drivers by passengers, as well as cell phone use, among others.
For emphasis, road traffic injuries alone are the leading cause of death among children aged 15-19 years and the second leading cause among 10-14-year-olds. These injuries are not inevitable; they are preventable. Ironically, most parents are not concerned, judging by their actions behind the wheel. Signs of these concerns are numerous.
Sometimes, I wonder if most parents are familiar with the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by our government, or the Child’s Rights Act (CRA) of 2003, designed to protect children’s rights in Nigeria, which aligns with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. These Acts state that children have the right to a safe environment and protection from injury and violence, stressing the responsibilities of society to protect children from birth up to the age of 18 years.
The 2000 United Nations Millennium Development Goals resolution sets as its fourth goal the need to reduce by two-thirds the mortality rates of children under the age of 5 years. Additionally, the United Nations General Assembly’s 2002 “A World Fit for Children” document outlines health goals for children, including one specific to injuries, which calls on all member states to “reduce child injuries due to accidents or other causes through the development and implementation of appropriate measures.”
Annually, the WHO and UNICEF call for greatly expanded global efforts to prevent child injury. The WHO/UNICEF World Report on Child Injury Prevention reminds us every year that hundreds of families around the world are torn apart daily by the loss of a child to unintentional injuries or so-called “accidents” that could have been prevented. The report laments that children’s injuries have been neglected for many years and notes that children’s maturity and interests differ from those of adults.
Therefore, simply reproducing injury prevention strategies relevant to adults does not adequately protect children. The report affirms that there are proven interventions, such as child seats, which are the focus of this piece. Other interventions include cycling helmets, child-resistant packaging for medications, fencing around swimming pools, hot water tap temperature regulations, and window guards, to name a few.
Leadership Newspapers
Time To Buckle Up That Child
By Leadership News 3 seconds ago
Eighteen years ago, I was privileged to travel to Cape Town, South Africa. It wasn’t my first trip, but my second, having earlier visited Pretoria. Both trips were sponsored—in Naija parlance, we call it awoof (gift). The trip to Cape Town, South Africa, was an eye-opener regarding concrete and enduring interventions to protect lives, especially those of children.
Advertisement
The trip to Cape Town was for a training program that included a tour of some neighborhoods to assess the effectiveness of specific interventions. During one such tour, I witnessed volunteers providing traffic-calming measures to protect black kids in a black neighborhood in Gordon’s Bay. These volunteers took a stand to protect the group we all call the leaders of tomorrow, rather than sitting on the fence.
Back home, the reverse is the case. We often leave everything to God instead of taking a stand to protect children, whose birth we gladly celebrate with much fanfare. As a parent or guardian, are you aware of the provisions of Section 58(4) of the National Road Traffic Regulations, 2004, which mandate that all occupants of a vehicle use a seatbelt for their safety? Do you know that this provision also covers children?
Whenever I focus on the dangerous trend of transporting children incorrectly, I reflect on what obtains in developed countries, where a newborn child must be transported in an appropriate car seat from the first day. I rhetorically ask readers who are parents or guardians: given the increasing number of unsafe practices by parents and guardians, especially women or mothers, which is ironic and strange to me.
Daily, I see mothers, especially during school runs, carrying children under twelve years in the front passenger seat, and sometimes two children of that age are seated in the front. To further complicate this risky driving behavior, the mother also uses her phone, which distracts and impairs her.
RELATED
Of Taribo’s Entitlement And Our Collapsing Infrastructure
Of Taribo’s Entitlement And Our Collapsing Infrastructure
1 minute ago
Rogo: Between Misinformation and Facts
Rogo: Between Misinformation and Facts
2 hours ago
ADVERTISEMENT
Whenever I stress these questions, I merely seek to challenge your consciousness regarding the dangers we expose our children to, despite our claim that we love and cherish them so much. Most of us who have heeded the Federal Road Safety Corps’ call to use seatbelts, unfortunately, do not see the sense in protecting our children while driving by strapping them in. Some lap them, while others leave them unattended in moving vehicles. Some claim that strapping children in a car seat is an alien practice.
This group maintains that strapping children in a car is meant for the white man, not the black man. Others say it is meant for the wealthy, while for some, it is a status symbol habit for those striving to flaunt their class. For others, the cost of a car seat is high, even though the cheapest cars they drive cost at least five million naira, and other cars go for as high as sixty or hundreds of millions of naira, compared to car seats whose cost can’t even buy the tires for these cars.
Even if car seats were as expensive as tires, would that be too much for the protection of the life of God’s precious gift? Yet, these same parents would not mind spending thousands on drinks, pepper soup, and other extras with friends and business partners. The female ones would prefer spending thousands or millions of naira on designer shoes and bags but not on the safety of their children.
ADVERTISEMENT
These self-centered choices that parents make are, to me, absurd, to say the least. I believe that child safety should remain the passion of every parent, including would-be parents. It has been over fifteen years since the Federal Road Safety Corps introduced the seatbelt driving culture novelty. Yet, a greater percentage of parents and guardians don’t care about child safety.
Daily, these children, whether in school buses or family vehicles, are transported without any regard for their safety. Over the years, child passenger safety campaign themes, such as “Don’t kill the Child, Kill the Bad habit,” have been developed to raise safety awareness about children’s safety. This is because road safety crises are the leading cause of preventable death, the third-largest cause of disabilities, and the second-largest cause of death after AIDS/HIV in Africa.
A study has shown that 10% of global road deaths occurred in Africa, although only 4% of the world’s registered vehicles are on the continent. This study posits that if reporting of road crashes were to improve, the road crash index on the continent would likely show more deaths. According to this study, South Africa and Nigeria account for most of the reported deaths.
These deaths, according to the study, are caused mostly by human error and vehicle factors, including overspeeding, dangerous overtaking, alcohol and drug abuse, negligence of drivers, poor driving standards, and overloaded people or goods vehicles. Other factors include poor tire maintenance, burst tires, bad roads and hilly terrain, negligence of pedestrians, distraction of drivers by passengers, as well as cell phone use, among others.
For emphasis, road traffic injuries alone are the leading cause of death among children aged 15-19 years and the second leading cause among 10-14-year-olds. These injuries are not inevitable; they are preventable. Ironically, most parents are not concerned, judging by their actions behind the wheel. Signs of these concerns are numerous.
Sometimes, I wonder if most parents are familiar with the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by our government, or the Child’s Rights Act (CRA) of 2003, designed to protect children’s rights in Nigeria, which aligns with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. These Acts state that children have the right to a safe environment and protection from injury and violence, stressing the responsibilities of society to protect children from birth up to the age of 18 years.
The 2000 United Nations Millennium Development Goals resolution sets as its fourth goal the need to reduce by two-thirds the mortality rates of children under the age of 5 years. Additionally, the United Nations General Assembly’s 2002 “A World Fit for Children” document outlines health goals for children, including one specific to injuries, which calls on all member states to “reduce child injuries due to accidents or other causes through the development and implementation of appropriate measures.”
Annually, the WHO and UNICEF call for greatly expanded global efforts to prevent child injury. The WHO/UNICEF World Report on Child Injury Prevention reminds us every year that hundreds of families around the world are torn apart daily by the loss of a child to unintentional injuries or so-called “accidents” that could have been prevented. The report laments that children’s injuries have been neglected for many years and notes that children’s maturity and interests differ from those of adults.
Therefore, simply reproducing injury prevention strategies relevant to adults does not adequately protect children. The report affirms that there are proven interventions, such as child seats, which are the focus of this piece. Other interventions include cycling helmets, child-resistant packaging for medications, fencing around swimming pools, hot water tap temperature regulations, and window guards, to name a few.
The above is proof that children rank high in the vulnerable user graph. In countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States of America, authorities are concerned about protecting vulnerable road users, particularly children. Parents, especially mothers, should show greater restraint in the unsafe practices they engage in while caring for children.
Motor crashes remain the leading cause of unintentional injury-related deaths among children aged 14 and under. However, wearing seatbelts could prevent many of these deaths and serious injuries. Over the last 25 years, it is conservatively estimated that in highly motorized countries, about 310,000 fatalities and more than a million moderate to critical injuries have been prevented through the wearing of seatbelts (car restraints), especially for children.
-Leadership
Article
Court adjourns Ganduje’s corruption trial to April 15
A Kano State High Court has adjourned until April 15 the trial of former governor Abdullahi Ganduje, his wife, Hafsat Umar, and son, Abdullahi Umar, alongside five other defendants, over alleged misappropriation of public funds amounting to billions of naira.
The defendants are facing an 11-count charge bordering on bribery, conspiracy, misappropriation, and diversion of public funds. The remaining accused persons are Abubakar Bawuro, Jibrilla Muhammad, Lamash Properties Ltd, Safari Textiles Ltd, and Lasage General Enterprises Ltd.
At the resumed hearing, the prosecution told the court it was ready to proceed and drew attention to a motion dated November 24, 2025, seeking leave to file additional proof of evidence.
However, defence lawyers raised objections, informing the court that multiple applications were pending and must be resolved before the trial could continue.
Lydia Oluwakemi-Oyewo, counsel to some of the defendants, said the defence had filed a motion dated July 17, 2025, seeking a stay of proceedings.
Adekunle Taiye-Falola, representing the third and seventh defendants, also referred to a separate motion dated May 23, 2025.
In addition, Muhammad Shehu, counsel to the fifth defendant, told the court that an affidavit had been filed notifying it of a pending application for stay of proceedings before the Court of Appeal.
Abubakar Ahmad, counsel to the sixth defendant, informed the court that he had filed a notice of preliminary objection and an application for extension of time to respond on points of law dated February 2, urging the court to fix a date for hearing.
Only Faruk Asekome, counsel to the eighth defendant, indicated readiness to proceed with the trial.
After hearing arguments from both sides, the presiding judge, Justice Amina Adamu-Aliyu, adjourned the matter to April 15 for the hearing of all pending applications and preliminary objections.
The trial has suffered repeated delays due to legal challenges. The high court had earlier dismissed preliminary objections raised by the defence as “incompetent” and affirmed its jurisdiction to hear the case.
That ruling was appealed by the defendants, who argued that the trial court lacked jurisdiction. However, in October 2025, the Kano Division of the Court of Appeal struck out the appeal, citing failure to properly transmit the record of appeal.
-Guardian
Article
No scripture forbids tattoos – Pastor Kingsley Okafor
Founder of the David Christian Centre and popular relationship coach, Pastor Kingsley Okonkwo, has doubled down on his decision to get a tattoo, saying there is no scripture that says a child of God cannot have a tattoo.
The cleric’s decision to get a tattoo reading “3:16” in Roman numerals, a reference to John 3:16 in the Bible, sparked controversy on social media.
His action was condemned by netizens who cited Leviticus 19:28, a Bible passage that reads, “Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the Lord.”
Dismissing the argument against his decision, Pastor Okonkwo said in an interview, “There’s no scripture that says a child of God cannot have tattoo. So, people are (just) doing personal preference, or what the Holy Spirit told them, or their church’s preferences. They want to impose this on other people, and that’s not how this works. Everyone needs to know Christ and the word of God.
“Somebody needs to sit me down and say tattoos are bad because if somebody draws ink on their body, their brain goes bad; if somebody draws ink on their body, their character suddenly goes bad. They must give me scriptural or scientific proof, or something to back this up.”
“Nobody can tell me why tattoo is bad. It’s just bad because… no reason. This kind of thinking is saddening for me because how is Africa going to catch up with development if we are still thinking ‘oh, somebody wore jeans and went to rob, so jeans are now bad. Pastor cannot wear jeans because last week somebody wore jeans and went to rob a bank’. What are we talking about? So, I don’t see the basis.”
Eyebrows are tattoos, my critics do them – Kingsley Okonkwo
Further, Okonkwo stated that while tattoos may be associated with bad people, he could name 10 good people with tattoos.
“It’s the same reason why some people don’t want to go into politics. They say politics is for bad people. So, we have left it for the people we think are dirty. So, who is going to go there? That has been the mindset of the church. We avoid everything that looks bad, and then we complain,” he said.
In a TikTok video, Okonkwo descended on critics of his decision, reminding them of the questionable things they also do.
He said, “Today I’m seeing Christian girls buying human hair and wearing it to church, and they are typing on tattoo while wearing another human being’s hair.
“You don’t know the origin of Christianity in Nigeria. Go and ask the older people who are sincere, they will tell you that even your makeup was a sin just a few years ago… was sacrilege, taboo, evil.
“Today, I see people do eyebrow. You don’t know that eyebrow is tattoo? Are you not painting? If you are painting eyebrows, it is tattoo. Some people even do microblading. Is it not tattoo? It’s a form of tattoo.
“Do you know that there was a time, if you didn’t tie a scarf, you couldn’t go to church. Some of you didn’t know this. Who fought for that liberty you enjoy?
“There were times you couldn’t wear earrings, such that once you gave your life to Jesus, you threw away your earrings and all your jewellery. Some of you didn’t know these things, but today you are typing. I pity the level of ignorance you are carrying,
“There were times you couldn’t wear jeans in this body of Christ. I was here when you couldn’t wear jeans. Do you wear jeans? Oh, you are leading many astray.
“Some people are saying tattoo is leading people astray. I say jeans were leading people astray a few years ago, today we are wearing them. Do you wear jeans? Ungodly garment.”
Those who cut themselves are demon-possessed
In an old sermon sighted by our correspondent, Pastor Steven Anderson of Faithful Works Baptist Church in Arizona, USA. stated that tattoos, which involve cutting oneself, are similar to what demon-possessed people did in the Bible.
“Everybody who cuts themselves in the Bible is demon-possessed. And today, we see high schoolers by the thousands and millions cutting themselves,” Pastor Anderson said.
He then addressed those who love to claim that the law against tattoos is in the Old Testament and is no longer relevant. He did this by citing the next verse after the one against tattoos in Leviticus, which reads, “Do not prostitute thy daughter, to cause her to be a whore; lest the land fall to whoredom, and the land become full of wickedness.”
According to him, if their understanding is relevant, it means people can now go ahead and prostitute their daughters.
Our correspondent also found a YouTube sermon by Pastor Aaron Thompson explaining why tattoos are bad.
During a sermon at Strong Tower Baptist Church in the US, he said, “Tattoo is a heathen practice that has been going on since Noah got off the ark, basically. They’ve found mummies and people in ice in different places that had tattoos on them. People have been doing this heathen practice for a long time. It’s connected to religion; it’s connected to cannibalism; it’s connected to head hunting. There’s nothing good about tattoos.”
-Guardian
Article
Group Defends Tinubu’s Reforms
The Legacy Support Group for Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda has reaffirmed its backing for the Federal Government’s reform policies, declaring support for what it described as a long-term recovery framework aimed at building a more stable and prosperous Nigeria.
Speaking at a press conference, the group’s National Patron, Chief Mike Okiro, represented by Chief Marcel Ezenwa, said the coalition was committed to “joining the train of Renewed Hope” as a pathway to a better tomorrow. He conveyed Okiro’s full support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, noting that the administration’s reform direction is designed to reposition the country for sustainable growth and institutional stability.
Also addressing journalists, the group’s National Coordinator, Ezinna Chief Chima C. Duru, said the briefing was convened to respond to what he described as sustained negative narratives and political attacks against the Tinubu administration by opposition figures and “disgruntled political actors.”
He noted that while criticism is a legitimate feature of democracy, it must be constructive and fact-based, warning that politically driven misinformation could undermine necessary reforms.
On security, the group said terrorism and banditry predate the present administration but maintained that ongoing operational and structural reforms are producing gradual results.
It also highlighted youth and education interventions, including student loan schemes and empowerment programmes, as indicators of a governance focus on human capital development, stressing that economic recovery should be judged over a longer reform cycle with sustained policy continuity.
-Leadership
-
Article10 months ago5 Life Lessons from Manchester City EPL Current woes
-
Sports10 months agoLiverpool Announce Jürgen Klopp Return To The Club
-
Business10 months agoMTN Teams Up With Meta To Boost WhatsApp Call Quality
-
News10 months agoCommonwealth Observers Prepare For Gabon Presidential Election
-
Article10 months agoPonzi Scheme CEO Francis Uju Udoms of Addfx Case still Unresolved Despite SEC certification
-
News10 months agoChibok Girls: 11 Years Of Anguish, Broken Promises
-
News8 months agoNASRE Promises Support To Daily Times Group Business Editor, Oseni, Over Serious Road Accident
-
News10 months agoWike’s Enviable Road Construction Method along Nyanya- Maraba Highway
